Paul Griffin Communications
Paul Griffin
Communications

Phone: +61 7 3359 1988
Email: info@grif.com.au
PO Box 58
Chermside
Brisbane Q 4032

CRISIS COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING PROGRAM Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne & Canberra

Griffin Communications crisis communications training programs in Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne & Canberra are designed to give participants experience and skills in delivering effective communications to a range of media and public affairs audiences during the heat and stress of a full crisis situation.

The following program is a general outline of a typical crisis communications training course conducted by Griffin Communications. It must be stressed however that every training program is tailored individually to meet the particular needs of participants following in-depth consultations with each client.

The first half-day is generally applicable to all types of crisis communications situations throughout a wide range of industries and occupations. The second stage, a practical skills based training program is based on a hypothetical crisis scenario that is constructed to be as realistic and true to life as possible for the particular individuals undertaking the course. These hypothetical scenarios can be constructed in a wide variety of different ways to realistically reflect the possible crisis incidents that might confront any particular group of trainees.

This crisis communications program is conducted by Paul Griffin as the principal trainer utilizing PowerPoint graphics and augmented by video/audio tape case study illustrations as required. Participants receive a comprehensive set of training notes to assist them with the program and for later use as a reference work for dealing with real life crisis communications. Participants also receive a vhs videotape copy of their individual TV interview performance for their further perusal and revision.

The format of the second-half of the training program also involves a number of ancillary support trainers who perform a variety of different role-plays. These people create the necessary volume of phone calls and distracting inter-personal interactions with the trainees to reproduce the atmosphere of pressure and stress that is the hallmark of a real life crisis situation.

A video camera crew is required to act both as a camera of record for the overall training proceedings as well as to record the individual interviews and media conferences for later playback, analysis and coaching of participants.

Participants are invited to complete a pre-training questionnaire to provide the trainer with a better understanding of the individual needs and experience of each trainee.

Similarly, at the conclusion of the training, participants are invited to complete training assessment questionnaires in order to obtain their perspective on what has been achieved and their views on the quality of the training provided. A written report is provided to the client upon conclusion of the program detailing the trainer´s assessment of the outcomes and any apparent need for follow-up action.

Typical Full Day Crisis Training Agenda:

8.30am

Introduction by Paul Griffin and outline of the days proceedings

8.35am

The Nature of a Crisis

Participants are introduced to the following concepts:

Identifying an organisationīs exposure to possible crises and issues

Identifying potential damage to reputation, brands, products, profitability, credibility, popularity, trust, employee/consumer/shareholder relations

Typical crisis warning signs

The escalating steps of a crisis

Defining the problem, setting the priorities

9.00am

Developing a Crisis Communications Plan

Participants are taken through the following planning elements:

Keeping the plan simple and easy to use

The media spokesperson policy

Identifying the crisis team / call out procedures

Likely scenario development

Identifying target audiences

Key media message development

Media/Public Affairs contact list development

Compiling action checklists

Testing the plan / mock crisis scenario training

9.45am

Training Crisis Scenario

Trainees are now given the broad outline of a fictitious but realistic crisis scenario especially crafted to represent circumstances that could quite conceivably occur in their real life occupations tomorrow. This scenario will form the basis of the second part of their crisis communications training program. A group discussion now takes place to identify those planning elements from the previous subject unit that need to be addressed to effectively manage this fictitious crisis scenario. Morning tea is taken while the group discussion continues.

10.15am

Dealing with the News Media during a Crisis

An examination and group discussion of the following media elements:

Local media culture

International media culture

Delivering key media messages

Tips for the successful media interview

Journalistsī favourite difficult questions

Body language, dress and presentation

How to survive a press conference

The components of credibility

The press release

The media information kit

11.00am

Crisis Communication Resources

Preventing the crisis from becoming a nightmare

 Issuing statements by fax, phone, email, web page, hot line

Managing heavy telephone traffic in a crisis

Communication technical resources

Communication human resources

The crisis control room layout and setup

11.30am

The Dynamics of Crisis Communication

An examination of the emotional forces that cause people to react in the subjective way they often do to bad news and the techniques media spokespersons can use to win their confidence and trust during a crisis situation

12.00pm

Case Histories

An analysis and group discussion of some successful and unsuccessful attempts at managing real life communications during crises such as environmental catastrophe,

natural disaster, man-made disaster, product tampering, scandal, organisational change / downsizing / merger

12.30pm

LUNCH

The post luncheon part of this training program focuses on enhancing the hands-on media and public affairs communication skills of the participants during a hypothetical escalating crisis.  Realistic simulations of telephone calls, wire stories, radio and TV news reports, emails and faxes are used to set the initial scene, present the problem, gradually escalate the scale and pressure of the crisis on participants while introducing further complicating and difficult elements to the scenario. Participants respond by developing a plan for managing the crisis and adapting it as new challenges unfold. As the crisis further escalates participants focus on the need to effectively communicate with a wide range of audiences including local and international media, environmentalists, business interests, government agencies and other public affairs targets.

1.00pm

The Crisis Begins.

Participants receive a media wire service report of a major oil spill resulting from a night time collision between two large shipping tankers. The report details the formation of a huge oil slick inside the harbour that has fouled the adjacent coastline causing serious damage to the environment, wildlife and port loading facilities. Participants are requested to immediately formulate their public response strategy and release a media statement.

Almost immediately, telephones begin to ring continually with callers from local

 and international media organisations, shipping interests, environmental groups,

emergency services providers, the military, government agencies, waterfront

property owners and others overloading, distracting and pressuring the participants

with endless requests for information, public comment and action. Emails and

faxes are also constantly received requesting information and giving information.

The crisis takes a turn for the worse when officials advise that the harbour has now

been closed to all shipping until further notice. Meanwhile, participants are

receiving numerous requests for radio, print and wire service media interviews over

the telephone and in person.

1.30pm

First TV Interview.

Reporter Paul Griffin arrives on the scene with news camera crew and requests individual stand-up interviews with each participant. These interviews are video taped for later analysis

2.00pm

First News Media Conference.

If the participants have not already elected to do so they are now requested to hold an all-in news media conference to explain their approach to the resolution of the crisis. The media conference is videotaped for later evaluation.

3.00pm

Group Debrief and Coaching.

Participants now temporarily stand down from role-playing the crisis scenario to review the results of their efforts so far with the trainer. Videotapes of the individual interviews and media conference are examined, analysed and critiqued. The composition of the media release is also assessed. Participants are coached and tutored by the trainer in more effective ways of responding to media questioning and key message delivery. Effectiveness of the participantīs telephone interviews and other forms of communications is also evaluated and discussed.

3.30pm

Second TV Interview.

The role-play resumes and all participants now record another individual and more in-depth and challenging TV interview on their management of the crisis so far with reporter Paul Griffin for later play back and analysis in the final debriefing session. Simultaneously, other participants prepare a second media release based on new police information regarding two emergency workers killed and three seriously injured aboard one of the tankers while trying to stop the oil leak.

4.00pm

The Ambush.

Unannounced and uninvited, a TV news reporter and crew now walks into the crisis

control center with lights blazing and camera rolling and starts interviewing the

unprepared and flustered participants on the spot. Results are video taped for later

evaluation

4.30pm

Second Media Conference.

Participants now build on the experiences learnt in the first media conference by holding a second one to update news reporters on the progress of the oil spill crisis situation. Angry conservationists shouting slogans at the participants disrupt the news conference. Again the media conference is videotaped for later evaluation.

5.00pm

Second Group Debrief and Coaching.

Participants now stand down to review their final results. Videotapes of the individual TV interviews, the ambush interviews and the second media conference are reviewed and analysed. The composition of the second media release is also reviewed. Participants are again coached by the trainer in more effective ways of responding to media questioning and proactively delivering their key media messages. Responses to the telephone interviews are also evaluated

5.30pm

Recap of Main Points

Completion by participants of course evaluation questionnaires

Individual videotapes distributed to participants for further evaluation and perusal

Conclusion


Copyright © 2005 Paul Griffin Communications. All rights reserved. Please read our privacy policy.